Royalties & Bundles: How “All-in-One” Plans Cut Payouts — and When Clarity Might Arrive When a streaming service adds audiobooks (or other media) to a music plan and calls it a bundle, U.S. mechanical royalties for songwriters can be calculated at a discounted...
Every Play Pays™ — How Your Music Earns, and Why the Details Matter Your music did the work. The streams were delivered. The plays happened. Now the question is: did every play pay? At Studio Budgets, our mantra is Every Play Pays™. That means we believe your music...
2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings The tax landscape for music creators is changing rapidly. Effective January 2025, new IRS and regulatory provisions introduce tailored treatments for royalty income—from cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) on mechanical...
Per-Stream Payout Comparisons: Apple Leads, Peloton Surprises In January 2025, new data show that per-stream payouts across digital platforms remain vastly different — and that difference matters to creators. Platforms like Apple Music and non-traditional services...
All the Ways — and I Mean All - that Creator Make Money from Music Why this matters In an era where streaming dominates and traditional income sources shift, understanding every income stream available and how it works is the difference between scratching by and...
Drake and Allegations of Fake Billion Streams: What It Means for Streaming Integrity As of early November 2025, the music industry is again wrestling with streaming-fraud allegations, and one of its biggest names—Drake—is cited at the center of a new class-action...
The State of Artist Royalties in 2025: What Every Music Creator Needs to Know The music industry is generating more revenue than ever, yet the question of who benefits remains front and center for creators. With streaming payouts reaching historic highs, AI disrupting...
The Royalty Audit Process Your Royalties. Your Right to Know. What exactly is a royalty audit? A royalty audit is a professional review of your royalty statements and underlying financial records to confirm you’ve been paid what you’re owed. It checks whether all...
The Label Recoupment Trap: Why 87% of Signed Artists Never See Royalties You signed the deal. You delivered the album. The single went gold. Your royalty statement? $0. Welcome to the recoupment trap — where record labels deduct nearly every cost before an artist sees...
In the high-stakes intersection of creativity and commerce, few stories illustrate the power dynamics of ownership better than Taylor Swift’s years-long battle over her master recordings.
Claiming the rights to her music wasn’t just a money move—it was a move for autonomy. At 15, Swift signed her first deal with Big Machine Records and traded perpetual control of her masters for a shot at fame. In 2019, that decision came back to define artist-label relationships when her catalog was sold to Scooter Braun’s Ithaca Holdings without her consent. Swift’s counter? A daring re-recording campaign that didn’t just reclaim her voice—it exposed an industry built to benefit labels over creators.
For music creators navigating a system that often prioritizes others’ rights, Swift’s story isn’t just personal—it’s a blueprint for reclaiming control.
Swift’s journey began in 2005 when she signed with Big Machine. In return for advances and promotion, the label retained ownership of the masters for her first six albums: Taylor Swift (2006), Fearless (2008), Speak Now (2010), Red (2012), 1989 (2014) and Reputation (2017). This was standard practice in the pre-streaming era when labels bore the risk of physical distribution.
But Swift later called the deal “the carrot … yanked away” when she wrote: “All I’ve ever wanted was the opportunity to work hard enough to one day purchase my music outright… with no strings attached.”
By 2018, she signed with Republic Records under Universal Music Group—securing ownership of future masters, but the Big Machine catalog was still in limbo.
On June 30 2019, it was announced that Braun’s Ithaca Holdings acquired Big Machine—and with it, Swift’s masters.
Swift alleged she learned of the deal via public announcement and called it her “worst-case scenario.”
The fallout included re-recording her work and launching a fan-led campaign. While the original masters remained in others’ hands, Swift reclaimed value through Taylor’s Version releases, shifting licensing revenue away from the originals.
Faced with a locked-out catalog, Swift announced in August 2019 her plan to re-record the albums—leveraging contract clauses that allowed it after a certain time.
Fearless (Taylor’s Version) dropped April 2021, followed by Red (Taylor’s Version) in November 2021, Speak Now (TV) July 2023 and 1989 (TV) October 2023.
With each “Taylor’s Version” release, Swift regained control over new masters, added “From the Vault” tracks, and shifted licensing away from the originals—thus reducing the value of the previous master-owner’s asset.
Her Eras Tour pulled in $2 billion globally, fueling her leverage.
On May 30 2025, Swift announced she’d purchased her original masters from private-equity firm Shamrock Capital for an undisclosed nine-figure sum. “All of the music I’ve ever made… now belongs… to me,” she wrote in a public letter.
The deal closed one of the most visible artist-rights disputes in recent memory. Industry analysts called it a “watershed for musicians’ rights.”
The implications ripple beyond Swift: she prompted labels to strengthen re-recording clauses and made master-ownership standard bargaining-chip in modern contracts.
Master ownership matters. Owning your master recordings gives you control over licensing, sync and future revenue streams—while loss of ownership often means dependency and powerless.
Re-recording can be a powerful tool. With rights properly exercised, artists can redirect earnings, regain leverage and devalue previous assets—proof that control translates to value.
Metadata and contract details can’t be ignored. Studies show artists often earn less due to opaque deals or poor rights awareness. Swift’s fight made that visible.
Every play earns value—but only when you control the chain. At StudioBudgets, our mantra Every Play Pays™ drives home this truth: plays generate royalty potential only when creators hold or regain rights and control.
Taylor Swift’s journey from contract compliance to ownership revolution is more than personal vindication—it’s a blueprint for creators navigating today’s streaming-first, rights-ridden economy. You may not have Taylor’s fame or budget—but the strategy remains: sign smart, register rights, reclaim what you can and never assume someone else has your back.
Because when you own your masters, when you verify your splits, when you claim your rights—every play truly pays.
Royalties & Bundles: How “All-in-One” Plans Cut Payouts — and When Clarity Might Arrive When a streaming service adds audiobooks (or other media) to a music plan and calls it a bundle, U.S. mechanical royalties for songwriters can be calculated at a discounted...