Drake and Allegations of Fake Billion Streams: What It Means for Streaming Integrity

Nov 5, 2025 | Royalties

2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings

2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings

2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings The tax landscape for music creators is changing rapidly. Effective January 2025, new IRS and regulatory provisions introduce tailored treatments for royalty income—from cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) on mechanical...

The State of Artist Royalties in 2025:

The State of Artist Royalties in 2025:

The State of Artist Royalties in 2025: What Every Music Creator Needs to Know The music industry is generating more revenue than ever, yet the question of who benefits remains front and center for creators. With streaming payouts reaching historic highs, AI disrupting...

The Royalty Audit Process Explained

The Royalty Audit Process Explained

The Royalty Audit Process   Your Royalties. Your Right to Know. What exactly is a royalty audit? A royalty audit is a professional review of your royalty statements and underlying financial records to confirm you’ve been paid what you’re owed. It checks whether all...

Drake and Allegations of Fake Billion Streams: What It Means for Streaming Integrity

As of early November 2025, the music industry is again wrestling with streaming-fraud allegations, and one of its biggest names—Drake—is cited at the center of a new class-action lawsuit against Spotify. While no wrongdoing by the artist has been legally established, the case raises important questions about how fraudulent streams can affect payouts to legitimate creators. Below is a breakdown of the situation, its sources, and how this matters for your royalties.

The Latest Lawsuit: Spotify Accused of Enabling Fraudulent Streams

On November 2 2025, a class-action complaint was filed against Spotify in California, led by rapper RBX (legal name Eric Dwayne Collins). The suit claims Spotify has “turned a blind eye” to large-scale fraudulent streaming, and it specifically cites Drake as a beneficiary of “billions” of illegitimate plays. 

Key points from the complaint include:

  • The claim that a “non-trivial percentage” of Drake’s 37 billion+ streams on Spotify may have originated from bot accounts or otherwise manipulated usage data. 

  • Allegations of abnormal VPN usage, streaming activity in regions whose populations cannot support the volume of plays cited (for example, a cited four-day period in 2024 where over 250,000 streams of Drake’s song “No Face” purportedly originated in Turkey but were geo-mapped via UK VPNs). 

  • The argument that because Spotify pays royalties on a shared-pool model (artists receive a share of the total stream volume), artificially inflated streams reduce allocations to artists with legitimate traffic. 

    Spotify, for its part, states that it “heavily invests in … systems to combat artificial streaming,” and denies that it benefits from fraudulent activity. 

Importantly: Drake himself is not named as a defendant in the suit, and the allegations stop short of asserting his personal involvement. 

Historical Context: Drake’s Prior Legal Claims Against Streaming Manipulation

In November 2024, Drake (via his company Frozen Moments LLC) filed legal action against Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify, alleging that UMG engaged in artificial streaming and pay-to-play tactics to inflate the performance of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.” The filing claimed bot-driven plays, Siri mis-directs, and other schemes. 

That case was withdrawn in January 2025 without a financial settlement. 

The connection between these two situations underscores how streaming fraud allegations are crossing paths with major artists and high-profile catalog holders—even when direct liability isn’t proven.

Why This Matter Impacts Legitimate Streams and Artists

Even if an individual artist is not proven culpable, streaming manipulation affects the ecosystem in ways that matter to you:

  • Dilution of Shared Royalty Pools: Since services like Spotify allocate royalties based on an artist’s share of total streams, inflated play counts belonging to one artist reduce the share available to all others who streamed legitimately.

  • Detection & Removal Risk: When platforms detect suspicious patterns (bots, VPN masking, click farms), they may remove or withhold streams. That can reduce reported plays and thus royalty payouts for legitimate rights-holders.

  • Transparency & Auditing Gaps: Many artists lack visibility into how their streams are counted, how discovery mechanisms work, or how payouts are calculated. These lawsuits highlight the need for monitoring.

  • Reputational Risk and Contract Leakage: Artists or their labels may be more carefully scrutinized. Some catalog deals or distributor agreements may introduce clauses tied to “clean” stream data.

    These issues underscore the importance of accurate registration, metadata, and audit-ready royalty statements.

 

What Independent Creators Should Do

Here are proactive steps to guard your streaming-based income:

  • Register thoroughly: Ensure your works are registered with your PRO (e.g. ASCAP, BMI) and mechanical rights body (e.g. The MLC), and your catalog data is correct.

  • Monitor your streaming analytics: Track patterns of unusual geographic surges, suspicious playlist placements, or un-explained spikes.

  • Audit your royalty statements: Engage a royalty-audit specialist to review your reports and holds, particularly if payouts seem suppressed or inexplicable.

  • Stay updated on anti-fraud industry initiatives: Organisations such as Music Fights Fraud Alliance (MFFA) work to detect and prevent artificial streaming. 

The latest streaming-fraud allegations touch one of the highest-profile canaries in the coal-mine: Drake. Whether the claims ultimately prove valid or not, the implications are clear: legitimate streams and artists’ earnings depend on the integrity of platform data.

For independent creators, the message is straightforward: get your data right, watch your streams, and make sure your royalty pipeline is transparent. Because when fraud enters the stream-share model, it isn’t just numbers that get distorted — it’s do-able income.

  • Pitchfork, November 2 2025
  • HipHopDX, November 3 2025
  • Vulture, November 4 2025
  • The Guardian, November 26 2024
  • The Verge, January 15 2025
Privacy Act CCPA

Royalties & Bundles: How “All-in-One” Plans Cut Payouts — and When Clarity Might Arrive

Royalties & Bundles: How “All-in-One” Plans Cut Payouts — and When...

Taylor Swift’s Fight for Her Masters & What It Means for Creator Rights

Taylor Swift’s Fight for Her Masters & What It Means for Creator...

Every Play Pays™ – How Your Music Earns, and Why the Details Matter

Every Play Pays™ — How Your Music Earns, and Why the Details Matter Your...

2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings

2025 Tax Overhaul Impacts Royalty Earnings The tax landscape for music...

Per-Stream Payout Comparison: Apple Leads, Peloton Surprises

Per-Stream Payout Comparisons: Apple Leads, Peloton Surprises In January...

All the Ways – and I Mean All – that Creators Make Money from Music

All the Ways — and I Mean All - that Creator Make Money from Music Why...

The State of Artist Royalties in 2025:

The State of Artist Royalties in 2025: What Every Music Creator Needs to...

The Royalty Audit Process Explained

The Royalty Audit Process   Your Royalties. Your Right to Know. What...

The Label Recoupment Trap: Why 87% of Signed Artists Never See Royalties

The Label Recoupment Trap: Why 87% of Signed Artists Never See Royalties...

The Black Box: Why $3.2 Billion in Music Royalties Disappear Each Year – and How to Stop It

The Black Box: Why $3.2 Billion in Music Royalties Disappear Each Year —...